Make your own free website on Tripod.com

baslik-mikst.jpg

OUR DEPARTMENT'S MANUSCRIPTS
ALL MANUSCRIPTS
YAVUZ'S MANUSCRIPTS
ASIRDIZER'S MANUSCRIPTS
ZEYFEOGLU'S MANUSCRIPTS
DIZDAR'S MANUSCRIPTS
TUYJI'S MANUSCRIPTS
CITATION FORMS

CODE: 1055
 

THE EVALUATION OF CASES WHICH WERE REFERRED TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE COUNCIL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE BECAUSE OF CONTRADICTION ASSESSMENTS BETWEEN THE DECISIONS OF THE 4 TH SPECIAL BOARD (FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY) AND THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRIC OBSERVATION

 

 

Guzel S, Yavuz MS, Asirdizer, Yavuz E, Cansunar FN.

 

Annual Forensic Medicine Meetings-2001, Council of Forensic Medicine, Istanbul-2001, Book of Congress, pp:146-50.

 

ABSTRACT

 

Contradictory assessments in forensic psychiatry are common. In the present practice, courts and higher instances generally require the psychiatric opinion of the Council of Forensic Medicine. Contradictory opinions of the 4th Specialization Board {Forensic Psychiatry) and of the Department of Psychiatric Observation necessitate further discussion of the matter by the General Assembly of the Council of Forensic Medicine.

 

Between 1998 and 2000, a total of 153 cases were referred to the General Assembly for final evaluation and decision. in 96 cases, evaluation reports of the Department of Psychiatric Observation and of the 4th Specialization Board were induced. In further 57 cases, the report of the Observation Department was not present. 69 cases with contradictory assessment by the Observation Department and the 4th Specialization Board were re-evaluated by the General Assembly. in 10 cases, the final conduction was consistent with the evaluation of the Observation Department. 57 cases were assessed identically with the 4th Specialization Board. in 2 cases, the General Assembly presented a concussion different from both the Observation Department and the 4th Specialization Board. in 22 among 27 cases the concussions of the Assembly were consistent with them of both the Observation Department and the 4th Specialization Board. Dispense was present in the remaining 5 cases.

 

The present study discusses the reasons for Contradictory evaluation reports and the final assessment by the General Assembly. The reports were reviewed in the light of international classifications and proposals were made for more adequate assessments.

 

Key words: Forensic psychiatry, General assembly.

CITED BY:

1. Bilge Y. Adli Bilimlere Ait Kaynaklar Özet Kitabı, Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2003, s:331, 573.

LÜTFEN YAYINLARIMIZA YAPTIGINIZ SİTASYONLARI, SİTASYON FORMU' NU DOLDURARAK BİZE BİLDİRİNİZ. TEŞEKKÜR EDERİZ.
 
 
PLEASE GIVE INFORMATION US BY USING CITATION FORM, IF YOU CITED TO OUR MANUSCRIPTS, THANK YOU.
 

© COPYRIGHT, CELAL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ ADLİ TIP ANABİLİM DALI